McCoy v. Alioto
Filed 4/28/06 McCoy v. Alioto CA1/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| WAUKEEN Q. McCOY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ANGELA ALIOTO, et al., Defendants and Respondents. | A102945, A103454, A104172 A106425 (San Francisco County Super. Ct. Nos. 304904, 305221, 317997) |
In these consolidated appeals[1], appellant Waukeen Q. McCoy, individually, and doing business as the Law Offices of Waukeen Q. McCoy, appeals from a April 15, 2003, judgment, and a March 10, 2004, money judgment, in favor of respondents Angela Alioto, individually, and the Law Offices of Mayor Joseph L. Alioto and Angela Alioto, a Professional Law Corporation. McCoy challenges summary judgment rulings dismissing his causes of action for racial discrimination, fraud, and defamation, and the court's dismissal, after a bench trial, of his causes of action for breach of contract and malicious prosecution. Additionally, he contends the trial court erred in awarding respondents costs of $31,327.22 and attorney fees of $39,681.25, and including â€
