legal news


Register | Forgot Password

MITO v. TEMPLE RECYCLING CENTER CORPORATION

MITO v. TEMPLE RECYCLING CENTER CORPORATION
08:19:2010



MITO v




MITO > v. >TEMPLE >
RECYCLING CENTER CORPORATION











Filed 8/9/10











CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION ONE






>






KAROLEEN
MITO et al.,



Plaintiffs
and Appellants,



v.



TEMPLE RECYCLING CENTER CORPORATION et al.,



Defendants
and Respondents.




B219934



(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. BC395313)






APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles
County. James R. Dunn,
Judge. Reversed.

________

Justin G. Lynch for Plaintiffs and
Appellants.

Harrington, Foxx, Dubrow &
Canter, Mark W. Flory and Vanessa K. Herzog for Defendants and Respondents.

________
clear=all >

Plaintiffs
Karoleen and Magda Mito appeal from an order
dismissing their complaint with prejudice for failure to file it within the statute of limitations. Plaintiffs presented their complaint for
filing to the superior court clerk on July 24, 2008, which date was within the applicable two-year statute of
limitations. The clerk rejected it on
the ground that plaintiffs failed to attach the â€




Description Plaintiffs Karoleen and Magda Mito appeal from an order dismissing their complaint with prejudice for failure to file it within the statute of limitations. Plaintiffs presented their complaint for filing to the superior court clerk on July 24, 2008, which date was within the applicable two-year statute of limitations. The clerk rejected it on the ground that plaintiffs failed to attach the â€
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale