Ottosi v. Berry
Filed 10/25/06 Ottosi v. Berry CA2/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
| PAUL OTTOSI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROBERT BERRY, JERRYL BERRY, LLOYD DIX, JULIUS DIX, AND LAW OFFICES OF LLOYD DOUGLAS DIX, LLP, Defendants and Respondents. | B183186 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC322452) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] |
The petition for rehearing filed October 20, 2006, by appellant Paul Ottosi was considered, and the modification of opinion is ordered as follows:
Page 10, line 16, the sentence beginning “Nor does plaintiff dispute . . .” is deleted. The next sentence should read as follows: “In light of the parties’ negotiated settlement, as a matter of law, there was no favorable termination of the Fee Dispute Action in plaintiff’s favor.”
ARMSTRONG, Acting P.J. MOSK, J. KRIEGLER, J.
Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.
Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Property line Lawyers.
