P. v. Abrams
Filed 6/16/06 P. v. Abrams CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID ABRAMS, Defendant and Appellant. | D047413 (Super. Ct. Nos. SCE244059, SCE251594) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Herbert J. Exarhos and Charles W. Ervin, Judges. Affirmed.
On October 14, 2004, in superior court case No. SCE244059 David Abrams entered a negotiated guilty plea to second degree burglary. (Pen. Code, § 459.) The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on probation for three years subject to conditions, including a condition he obey all laws. On August 16, 2005, in superior court case No. SCE251594 Abrams entered a negotiated guilty plea to receiving stolen property. (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a).) The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on probation for three years subject to conditions, including a condition he serve 365 days in custody. It revoked and reinstated probation in case No. SCE244059, placing him on probation for three years subject to conditions, including a condition he serve 365 days in custody. The court issued a certificate of probable cause in both cases. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 30(b).)[1]
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth the evidence in the superior court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.
We granted Abrams permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded. A review of the entire record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, including the possible issues referred to pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issue. Competent counsel has represented Abrams on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
McDONALD, Acting P. J.
WE CONCUR:
McINTYRE, J.
AARON, J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.
Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Apartment Manager Lawyers.
[1] Because Abrams entered guilty pleas, he cannot challenge the facts underlying the convictions. (Pen. Code, § 1237.5; People v. Martin (1973) 9 Cal.3d 687, 693.) We need not recite the facts.
