P. v. Aguilar
Filed 10/4/06 P. v. Aguilar CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. YVONNE MARIE AGUILAR, Defendant and Appellant. |
F050169
(Super. Ct. No. F05908330-4)
O P I N I O N |
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. James L. Quaschnick, Judge.
Deborah Prucha, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. French, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
______________________
*Before Harris, A.P.J., Levy, J., and Dawson, J.
Appellant Yvonne Marie Aguilar pled guilty to attempting to pass a fictitious bill with intent to defraud (Pen. Code, § 476). The court sentenced appellant to prison for the lower term of 16 months.
Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief which summarizes the pertinent facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks that this court independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d. 436.) Appellant has not responded to this court’s invitation to submit additional briefing.
Following independent review of the record, we have concluded that no reasonably arguable legal or factual issues exist.
The judgment is affirmed.
Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.
Analysis and review provided by San Diego County Property line attorney.
