legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Annis

P. v. Annis
06:14:2006

P. v. Annis




Filed 5/5/06 P. v. Annis CA2/2







NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS




California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA






SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT







DIVISION TWO














THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


BARRY ANNIS,


Defendant and Appellant.



B182944


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. LA047357)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. John S. Fisher, Judge. Reversed.


Brent F. Romney and Carl K. Osborne, for Defendant and Appellant.


Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Lawrence M. Daniels and Margaret E. Maxwell, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


_________________



Barry Annis appeals from a judgment entered upon his conviction of possession of methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378) upon a negotiated plea of no contest, after his motion to suppress evidence pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5[1] was denied. The trial court sentenced appellant to a state prison term of two years. Appellant contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence because (1) the search warrant was invalid, (2) his consent to search was coerced and not voluntary, and (3) the police violated the â€





Description A decision regarding possession of methamphetamine for sale.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale