P. v. Antoine
Filed 6/13/06 P. v. Antoine CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Shasta)
----
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. IRENE LAVADA ANTOINE, Defendant and Appellant. | C050596
(Super. Ct. No. 05F2974)
|
A jury convicted defendant Irene Lavada Antoine of possessing a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)) and resisting a peace officer (Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)(1)) but acquitted her of two other charges. (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a); Health & Saf. Code, § 11364.) Defendant admitted four enhancements charging prior felony convictions under section 667.5, subdivision (b), and the trial court imposed an aggregate prison sentence of four years.
On appeal, defendant's sole claim of error is that the trial court violated principles enunciated in Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296 [159 L.Ed.2d 403] (Blakely) when imposing sentence. We affirm the judgment.
Discussion
Given the nature of this appeal, we dispense with a detailed recitation of the facts. Suffice it to say that a police officer arrested defendant after finding methamphetamine in defendant's possession. Defendant ran from the officer when he tried to place her in the patrol car.
In sentencing defendant, the court stated: â€
