P. v. Bienvenu
Filed 5/31/06 P. v. Bienvenu CA1/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JASON PAUL BIENVENU, Defendant and Appellant. | A111872 (Mendocino County Super. Ct. No. SCUKCRCR-05- 66995) |
Pursuant to a negotiated disposition, appellant Jason Paul Bienvenu pled guilty to possessing methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378) and admitted a prior strike allegation (Pen. Code, §§ 1170.12 & 667). Other counts and special allegations were dismissed. In accordance with the negotiated disposition, appellant was sentenced to the midterm of two years on the substantive count, which term was doubled pursuant to the Three Strikes law for a total commitment of four years.
Counsel for appellant has filed an opening brief raising no issues and requesting this court to conduct an independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. We have conducted the requested review and conclude that there are no arguable issues.
Appellant was represented throughout the proceedings by counsel. His plea and admission were validly entered after advisement of rights and consequences. There was no sentencing error.
Judgment affirmed.
_________________________
Reardon, Acting P.J.
We concur:
_________________________
Sepulveda, J.
_________________________
Rivera, J.
Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Santee Apartment Manager Lawyers.
