Filed 7/21/17 P. v. Boatman CA5


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JOSEPH JUSTIN BOATMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

F073480

(Super. Ct. No. 1488208)


OPINION


THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. Joseph R. Distaso, Judge.
Frank J. Torrano, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-




Appointed counsel for defendant Joseph Justin Boatman asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed and we received no communication from defendant. We find no arguable issues on appeal.
We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)
On May 30, 2015, defendant inflicted a traumatic injury upon a woman he was dating. On June 23, 2015, defendant pled no contest to felony domestic battery (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a).) and admitted having served a prior strike conviction (§§ 667, subd. (d), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)). On January 19 and 21, 2016, as agreed, the trial court sentenced him to the midterm of two years, doubled pursuant to the “Three Strikes” law. The court ordered him to pay a $1,200 restitution fine (§ 1202.4), a $1,200 suspended parole revocation fine (§ 1202.45), a $40 court security fee (§ 1465.8), and a $30 criminal conviction assessment fee (Gov. Code, § 70373). The court awarded him 108 days of actual custody credit and 108 days of conduct credit for a total of 216 days of credit.
Having reviewed the record, we find no arguable issues.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.