P. v. Brillon

Filed 3/21/06 P. v. Brillon CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

Christopher Brillon appeals an order determining him to be a mentally disordered offender pursuant to Penal Code section 2962 et seq., and committing him to the Department of Mental Health for treatment.

We appointed counsel to represent Brillon in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief raising no issues.

On February 3, 2006, we advised Brillon that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We have received a response asserting that insufficient evidence supports his conviction of the underlying offenses of stalking and possession of a weapon, and that his plea of nolo contendere to the underlying offenses is invalid because his attorney had a conflict of interest.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Brillon's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The order is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

GILBERT, P.J.

We concur:

YEGAN, J.

COFFEE, J.

John A. Trice, Judge

Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo

______________________________

Jerry D. Whatley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.

Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Apartment Manager Lawyers.