P. v. Britton
Filed 3/20/06 P. v. Britton CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Shasta)
----
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BOBBY LAWRENCE BRITTON, Defendant and Appellant. | C050125
(Super. Ct. No. 05F318)
|
Pursuant to a negotiated plea whereby he would receive a 32-month prison term, defendant Bobby Lawrence Britton pled guilty to one count of failure to register annually as a sex offender and admitted one of two prior strike allegations. Consistent with the agreement, defendant was sentenced to 32 months in state prison and the second strike allegation was dismissed.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
ROBIE , J.
We concur:
MORRISON , Acting P.J.
BUTZ , J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.
Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Apartment Manager Lawyers
