P. v. Calhoun
Filed 5/2/07 P. v. Calhoun CA4/1
Opinion following remand
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LAWRENCE LAMONT CALHOUN et al., Defendants and Appellants. | D042645 (Super. Ct. Nos. SCD170791, SCD170276) |
APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of San Diego County, David J. Danielsen, Judge. Judgments affirmed.
After we affirmed in part and reversed in part the trial court's judgments and remanded the matters for resentencing, the California Supreme Court granted review and reversed our judgment in People v. Calhoun (2007) 40 Cal.4th 398. Calhoun remanded the matters to us with instructions to reinstate the true findings on the Vehicle Code section 20001, subdivision (c) allegations against Calhoun and the two 6-year terms imposed on Waller. (Calhoun, at p. 408.)
Because Calhoun addressed and disposed of all the appellate issues originally raised by the parties, there are no remaining issues for us to address. We hereby incorporate herein the California Supreme Court's opinion in Calhoun without restating it in full.
DISPOSITION
We hereby reinstate the true findings on the Vehicle Code section 20001, subdivision (c) allegations against Calhoun and the two 6-year terms imposed on Waller. Accordingly, we affirm in full the trial court's judgments.
McDONALD, J.
WE CONCUR:
McCONNELL, P. J.
McINTYRE, J.
Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Santee Property line attorney.
