Fear Not Law Articles: P. v. Caliz

P. v. Caliz

Filed 7/27/07 P. v. Caliz CA2/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

RENAULDIE C. CALIZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

B194469

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. BA297577)

TO THE COURT:^*

Renauldie C. Caliz appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of count 1, carjacking with the use of a firearm (Pen. Code, 215, subd. (a); 1203.6, subd. (a)(1)), and count 2, dissuading a witness from making a report to police (Pen. Code, 136.1, subd. (b)(1)) arising out of the following: on February 4, 2006, appellant forced victim Adrian Toledo to give him his car keys at gunpoint. Appellant also robbed Toledo of his wallet and told him he would kill Toledo and do something to his family if he called the police. Toledo called the police, who apprehended appellant two hours later.

Appellant was sentenced to five years for count 1 and an additional 10 years for the use of a firearm (Pen. Code, 12022.53, subd. (b)), and two years as to count 2, to run concurrently. We appointed counsel to represent him on this appeal.

After examination of the record, counsel filed a Statement by Counsel on Appeal Pursuant to People v. Wende which contained an acknowledgment that she had been unable to find any arguable issues.

On March 29, 2007, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. We granted his request for an extension of time to file a brief to May 30, 2007. No response has been received to date.

We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellants attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS.

Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.

Analysis and review provided by Santee Property line attorney.

^* BOREN, P. J., ASHMANN-GERST, J., CHAVEZ, J.

Description	Renauldie C. Caliz appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of count 1, carjacking with the use of a firearm (Pen. Code, 215, subd. (a); 1203.6, subd. (a)(1)), and count 2, dissuading a witness from making a report to police (Pen. Code, 136.1, subd. (b)(1)) arising out of the following: on February 4, 2006, appellant forced victim Adrian Toledo to give him his car keys at gunpoint. Appellant also robbed Toledo of his wallet and told him he would kill Toledo and do something to his family if he called the police. Toledo called the police, who apprehended appellant two hours later. Court have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellants attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.) The judgment is affirmed.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.