Filed 1/4/18 P. v. Cardoza CA5




NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

SONNY CARDOZA,

Defendant and Appellant.

F075270

(Super. Ct. No. BF165981A)


OPINION

THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Eric Bradshaw, Judge.
Steven A. Torres, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-


Appointed counsel for defendant Sonny Cardoza asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We sent a letter to defendant, advising him of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. Defendant did not respond. On review, we find no arguable issues.
We provide the following brief description of the factual and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)
On October 18, 2016, defendant hit a woman who had a restraining order against him. He caused a one and one-half inch laceration on her head.
On December 22, 2016, defendant pled no contest to felony domestic violence (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)) and admitted personally inflicting great bodily injury (§ 12022.7, subd. (e)).
On February 23, 2017, the trial court denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea, which was based on his contention that the court should have informed him of the consequences of Evidence Code section 1109—that is, that his conviction could be used against him in a subsequent domestic violence case. The court sentenced him to two years, plus a three-year term on the great bodily injury enhancement. The court then stayed the enhancement pursuant to section 1385, subdivision (c)(1), imposed various fines and fees, and issued a protective order under section 273.5, subdivision (j).
On March 2, 2017, defendant filed a notice of appeal. The trial court granted his request for a certificate of probable cause, in which he contended he had raised an unsuccessful motion to withdraw his plea on the basis that he had not properly been informed of the consequences of his plea.
Having reviewed the entire record, we find no arguable issues on appeal.
 
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.