P. v. Casillas
Filed 10/19/06 P. v. Casillas CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JUAN MANUEL CASILLAS, Defendant and Appellant. | 2d Crim. No. B190272 (Super. Ct. No. YA063512-01) (Los Angeles County)
|
Juan Manuel Casillas pled no contest to possessing marijuana for sale and admitted a prior serious felony conviction under the Three Strikes law. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11359; Pen. Code, § 1170.12, subd. (c)(1).) He was sentenced to six years in prison as specified in his plea agreement.
We appointed counsel to represent Casillas in this appeal. After reviewing the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and requesting this court to independently review the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. We advised Casillas that he had 30 days in which to submit a written brief or letter stating any contentions or arguments he wished us to consider. Casillas filed a brief attaching portions of the record on appeal and requesting that counsel be appointed to assist him. We have examined the record and are satisfied that Casillas's appointed appellate counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.) We deny Casillas's request for counsel as counsel on appeal has already been provided.
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
COFFEE, J.
We concur:
YEGAN, Acting P.J.
PERREN, J.
Thomas S. Sokolov, Judge
Mark S. Arnold, Judge
Superior Court County of Los Angeles
______________________________
Carlo Andreani, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Property line attorney.
