legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Chandra

P. v. Chandra
11:06:2006

P. v. Chandra


Filed 10/27/06 P. v. Chandra CA6






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT










THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


RONALD REVINESH CHANDRA,


Defendant and Appellant.



H029799


(Monterey County


Super. Ct. No. SS031858)



Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement defendant Ronald Revinesh Chandra pled guilty to one count of attempted, nonpremeditated murder (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 664, subd. (a)) and admitted having personally used a firearm in the commission of the offense. (Id., § 12022.5.) He was sentenced to the agreed-upon 17 years in prison.


According to the transcript of the preliminary hearing, defendant had approached one of his neighbors, pointed a .45-caliber semi-automatic handgun at the neighbor, and repeatedly pulled the trigger. The gun failed to discharge and defendant ran after the neighbor. Defendant continued to point the gun at the neighbor while he attempted to chamber a round of ammunition into the gun. Defendant chased the neighbor up to his house, all the while pulling the slide on the gun forward and back and tapping the slide as if to seat the magazine for firing. The neighbor struggled with defendant and had him pinned face down on the ground when the police arrived.


We appointed counsel to represent defendant in this court. Appointed counsel filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts but raises no specific issues. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument in his own behalf within 30 days. That period has elapsed and we have received no written argument from defendant.


Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal.


The judgment is affirmed.



Premo, J.


WE CONCUR:



Rushing, P.J.



Elia, J.


Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.


Analysis and review provided by El Cajon Property line Lawyers.





Description Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement defendant pled guilty to one count of attempted, nonpremeditated murder and admitted having personally used a firearm in the commission of the offense. Court appointed counsel filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts but raises no specific issues. Court reviewed the entire record and concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal. The judgment is affirmed.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale