P. v. Clark
Filed 7/19/06 P. v. Clark CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
----
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RICHARD GLENN CLARK, Defendant and Appellant. | C049930
(Super. Ct. No. 04F04939)
|
Following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5), defendant Richard Glenn Clark pled no contest to manufacturing methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379.6, subd. (a)). He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress (People v. Miranda (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 917, 922), the record reveals the following facts taken from the suppression hearing:
City of Folsom Detective Jason Browning was told by a confidential informant that minor J.C. was involved in narcotics sales. Browning contacted J.C.'s probation officer, Daniel LaRue, who advised Browning that J.C. was on searchable probation. On June 3, 2004, Browning and Senior Deputy Probation Officer Tim Ruiz went to J.C.'s probation address to perform a probation search. Additional officers remained outside the residence.
Browning, wearing a raid vest that said â€
