P. v. Connole
Filed 4/18/06 P. v. Connole CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TIMOTHY SCOTT CONNOLE, Defendant and Appellant. | 2d Crim. No. B186071 (Super. Ct. No. SA056725) (Los Angeles County)
|
Timothy Scott Connole appeals a judgment entered following conviction by jury of misdemeanor willful harm or injury to a child, and misdemeanor assault. (Pen. Code, §§ 273a, subd. (b) & 240.) The trial court sentenced Connole to 365 days' confinement in county jail.
We appointed counsel to represent Connole in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief raising no issues.
On February 15, 2006, and February 27 2006, we advised Connole that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a response from him.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Connole's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
GILBERT, P.J.
We concur:
YEGAN, J.
PERREN, J.
Amy D. Hogue, Judge
Superior Court County of Los Angeles
______________________________
John D. O'Loughlin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Apartment Manager Attorneys.
