P. v. Contival

Filed 7/24/06 P. v. Contival CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, H029364

(San Benito County

v. Super. Ct. No. CR0401556)

CHARRON LEE CONTIVAL,

Defendant and Appellant.

_________________________________/

Charron Lee Contival appeals after pleading no contest to one count of grand theft by embezzlement (Pen. Code, § 503). The court stayed imposition of sentence and placed appellant on formal probation with conditions. We appointed counsel to represent appellant. Counsel has filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts, but raises no specific issues. We have notified appellant of her right to submit written argument. Appellant has not submitted written argument.

Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

ELIA, J.

WE CONCUR:

__________________________________

RUSHING, P. J.

__________________________________

PREMO, J.

Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.

Analysis and review provided by Poway Real Estate Lawyers.