P. v. Coyazo
Filed 1/10/07 P. v. Coyazo CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTONIO MURATALLA COYAZO, Defendant and Appellant. | G036671 (Super. Ct. No. 02CF0424) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Patrick H. Donahue, Judge. Affirmed.
Richard Power, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Barry Carlton and James H. Flaherty III, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
* * *
Defendant Antonio Muratalla Coyazo was convicted of six counts involving the attempted murder, kidnapping and carjacking of one victim, and the robbery or attempted robbery of four others. He claims a number of errors, including the improper admission of his confession and hearsay evidence, the lack of sufficient evidence on several charges, and sentencing errors. We find no error and affirm.
I
FACTS[1]
In January 2002, defendant and his friend Mynor Rolando Cordon-Suchtiz (known to defendant as â€