P. v. Craig
Filed 8/8/06 P. v. Craig CA6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM SCOTT CRAIG, Defendant and Appellant. | H029682 (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. CC450224) |
In the court below, defendant William Scott Craig unsuccessfully moved to suppress evidence seized from his home and car pursuant to a search warrant. Thereafter, he pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine for sale and possession of marijuana for sale. On appeal, he contends that the affidavit in support of the warrant was insufficient to furnish probable cause. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
the affidavit
The affidavit in this case was signed by San Jose Police Detective Andrew Binder and related the following.
Within the past 60 days, confidential informant X had told another officer (Officer UC) that he knew a person named â€
