P. v. Creech

Filed 4/11/06 P. v. Creech CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

Timothy Allen Creech appeals from the judgment imposing felony probation and 180 days in jail for violation of Proposition 36 probation terms. (Pen. Code, § 1210.1.)

We appointed counsel to represent Creech on this appeal. After reviewing the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and requesting that this court independently examine the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.

On February 3, 2006, we advised Creech that he had 30 days in which to submit a written brief or letter stating any contentions or arguments he wished us to consider. Creech did not respond.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Creech's attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

PERREN, J.

We concur:

YEGAN, A.P.J.

COFFEE, J.

John E. Dobroth, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Jolene Larimore, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.

Analysis and review provided by El Cajon Apartment Manager Lawyers.