legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Cruz CA3

mk's Membership Status

Registration Date: May 18, 2017
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 05:23:2018 - 13:04:09

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
P. v. Mendieta CA4/1
Asselin-Normand v. America Best Value Inn CA3
In re C.B. CA3
P. v. Bamford CA3
P. v. Jones CA3

Find all listings submitted by mk
P. v. Cruz CA3
By
03:14:2019

Filed 1/24/19 P. v. Cruz CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yuba)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

LUIS ALBERTO CRUZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

C087475

(Super. Ct. No. CRF180000587)

While conducting an investigation, a police officer spotted defendant Luis Alberto Cruz. Defendant was then seen dropping a glass pipe. When the officer attempted to detain him, defendant refused to take his hand from his pocket. Defendant then pulled away and tried to run. When the officer tried to restrain him, defendant struggled and struck the officer in the head several times. Defendant was eventually restrained by multiple officers.

Defendant pled no contest to resisting an executive officer. The trial court imposed a two-year middle term and awarded 97 days of custody credits (49 actual, 48 conduct). It also imposed various fines and fees.

Counsel for defendant filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and requests that we review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant.

Having examined the record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

/s/

Robie,. J.

We concur:

/s/

Raye, P. J.

/s/

Renner, J.





Description While conducting an investigation, a police officer spotted defendant Luis Alberto Cruz. Defendant was then seen dropping a glass pipe. When the officer attempted to detain him, defendant refused to take his hand from his pocket. Defendant then pulled away and tried to run. When the officer tried to restrain him, defendant struggled and struck the officer in the head several times. Defendant was eventually restrained by multiple officers.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 29 views. Averaging 29 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale