P. v. Curtis
Filed 8/23/06 P. v. Curtis CA1/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT BLAKE CURTIS, Defendant and Appellant. | A112685 (Lake County Super. Ct. No. CR903578) |
Defendant appeals from a judgment following his plea of guilty and admission. His counsel has raised no issues and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any issues that would, if resolved favorably to defendant, result in reversal or modification of the judgment. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436; see Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259.) We affirm.
Following defendant's waiver of a preliminary hearing, an information was filed on January 24, 2005, charging defendant with bringing a controlled substance into a jail (Pen. Code § 4573), transporting a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code § 11379, subd. (a)), possession of a controlled substance for sale (Health & Saf. Code § 11378), and falsely representing and identifying himself as another person to a police officer (Pen. Code § 148.9, subd. (a)). It was also alleged pursuant to Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b) that defendant had served two prior prison terms after being convicted of violations of Penal Code sections 245, subdivision (a)(1) and 243, subdivision (c).
On January 14, 2005, when the defendant and the prosecutor agreed to waive a preliminary hearing, the deputy district attorney offered to accept pleas to counts 1 and 4 and dismiss counts 2 and 3 with â€
