legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Diop

P. v. Diop
06:28:2006

P. v. Diop











Filed 6/27/06 P. v. Diop CA2/2










NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS




California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.




IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION TWO










THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


ABABACAR DIOP,


Defendant and Appellant.



B183404


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. BA272669)



THE COURT:*


Appellant Ababacar Diop appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of one count of sale of a controlled substance (cocaine base) in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11352, subdivision (a).[1] After appellant waived his right to a jury trial on his prior convictions, the court found true the allegations that appellant had suffered a 1996 conviction for violating section 11352, subdivision (a) and a 2001 conviction for violating section 11351.5. The court sentenced appellant to the high term of five years for the current conviction and a consecutive three-year enhancement pursuant to section 11370.2, subdivision (a) based on one of his prior convictions.


We appointed counsel to represent appellant on this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an â€





Description A decision regarding sale of a controlled substance (cocaine base) in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11352, subdivision (a).
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale