P. v. Dominguez
Filed 10/24/07 P. v. Dominguez CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARCO ANTONIO DOMINGUEZ, Defendant and Appellant. | D050072 (Super. Ct. No. SCD197600) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Janet I. Kintner, Judge. Affirmed.
Marco Antonio Dominguez entered a negotiated guilty plea pursuant to People v. West (1970) 3 Cal.3d 595 to transporting cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, 11352, subd. (a)) that was not for personal use (Pen. Code, 1210, subd. (a)) and possessing cocaine base for sale (Health & Saf. Code, 11351.5). The court placed him on three years' probation. Dominguez appeals. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
A search of a vehicle Dominguez was driving on March 10, 2006, revealed at least 21.14 grams of cocaine base.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings below. She presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, she lists, as possible but not arguable issues, (1) whether the court abused its discretion by denying Dominguez's motion to suppress evidence as untimely and (2) whether there was an adequate factual basis for the guilty plea as required by Penal Code section 1192.5.
We granted Dominguez permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issues listed pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Dominguez has been competently represented by counsel on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.
WE CONCUR:
NARES, J.
IRION, J.
Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Property line attorney.
