P. v. Duron
Filed 5/31/06 P. v. Duron CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CRUZ CABRAL DURON, Defendant and Appellant. |
F049020
(Super. Ct. No. 03CM2067A)
OPINION |
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County. Louis F. Bissig, Judge.
Maureen L. Fox, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. French, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
Appellant, Cruz Cabral Duron, pled guilty to possession for sale of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378). On October 6, 2005, the court sentenced Duron to the aggravated term of three years.
Duron's appellate counsel has filed a brief which summarizes the facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Duron has not responded to this court's invitation to submit additional briefing.
Following independent review of the record we find that no reasonably arguable factual or legal issues exist.
The judgment is affirmed.
Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Santee Apartment Manager Attorneys.
* Before Cornell, Acting P.J., Gomes, J., and Dawson, J.