P. v. Erickson

Filed 8/28/06 P. v. Erickson CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Kenneth Fernandez, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.

Randall B. Bookout, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

On November 22, 2005, defendant was placed on a formal grant of probation after pleading guilty to a violation of Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a), as charged in the felony complaint filed by the District Attorney of Riverside County.

Thereafter, on February 23, 2006, defendant's grant of probation revoked and reinstated as modified by the court.

Defendant appealed, and upon his request this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493] setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.

We offered the defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done.

We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

/s/ RAMIREZ

P.J.

We concur:

/s/ HOLLENHORST

J.

/s/ RICHLI

J.

Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.

Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Property line Lawyers.