P. v. Flores
Filed 7/18/07 P. v. Flores CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT ANTHONY FLORES, Defendant and Appellant. | 2d Crim. No. B195156 (Super. Ct. No. 1190544) (Santa Barbara County) |
Robert Anthony Flores appeals a judgment of conviction entered after he expressly waived his constitutional rights and pleaded nolo contendere to assault with personal use of a firearm, the making of criminal threats, and the sale of methamphetamine. (Pen. Code, 245, subd. (a)(2) & 422; Health & Saf. Code, 11379, subd. (a).) Flores received a stipulated sentence of five years and eights months' imprisonment, consisting of a four-year upper term for assault with personal use of a firearm, and subordinate consecutive sentencing for the remaining two counts. By an amended abstract of judgment, the trial court awarded Flores total presentence custody credits of 834 days. The trial court also imposed a $3,600 restitution fine and a $3,600 stayed parole revocation restitution fine. (Pen. Code, 1202.4, subd. (b) & 1202.45.) The trial court dismissed remaining counts in the information.
We appointed counsel to represent Flores in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief raising no issues.
On May 30, 2007, we advised Flores that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a response from him.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Flores's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
GILBERT, P.J.
We concur:
YEGAN, J.
PERREN, J.
James E. Herman, Judge
Superior Court County of Santa Barbara
______________________________
California Appellate Project, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director, and Richard B. Lennon, Staff Attorney, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney referral.
Analysis and review provided by Vista Property line Lawyers.
