P. v. Flores
Filed 8/24/06 P. v. Flores CA2/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RICHARD FLORES, Defendant and Appellant. | B183373 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA062618) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Joan Comparet-Cassani, Judge. Affirmed as Modified.
Robert L.S. Angres, under appointment by the Court of Appeal for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Herbert S. Tetef and Noah P. Hill, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Richard Flores appeals from a judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) with the finding within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (c) that another person, other than an accomplice, was present in the residence during the commission of the offense. He admitted that he suffered a prior conviction for a serious or violent felony within the meaning of Penal Code sections 1170.12, subdivisions (a) through (d), 667, subdivisions (b) through (i), and 667, subdivision (a)(1) and two prior convictions within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b). Sentenced to prison for 17 years, he contends the trial court committed prejudicial error when it allowed his â€
