legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Fosselman

P. v. Fosselman
03:14:2007





P





P. v.
Fosselman


 


 


 


 


Filed 1/29/07  P. v.
Fosselman CA6


 


 


 


NOT TO BE
PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California
Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for
publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


 


 IN THE COURT OF
APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SIXTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT


 


 


THE PEOPLE,                                                                       H029595


 


                        Plaintiff and Respondent,                             (Santa
Clara County


                                                                                                 Superior
Court


            v.                                                                                
No. CC463969)


 


JEROME FOSSELMAN,


 


                        Defendant and Appellant.


_____________________________________/


 


            Defendant was convicted by jury trial of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211,
212.5, subd. (c)) and carrying a concealed
dirk or dagger on his person
(Pen. Code, § 12020, subd. (a)(4)), and the
jury found true the allegation that he had personally
used a deadly or dangerous weapon in the commission of the robbery
(Pen.
Code, § 12022, subd. (b)(1)).  The court found true allegations that defendant
had suffered four prior serious felony convictions (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds.
(a), (b)-(i), 1170.12) and five times served prison terms for felony
convictions (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)).  Defendant was committed to state prison to serve an indeterminate
term of 25 years to life consecutive to a determinate term of 11 years.  On
appeal, defendant claims that the trial court erred in giving a prejudicially
erroneous instruction on the â€





Description Defendant was convicted by jury trial of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, S 211, 212.5, subd. (c)) and carrying a concealed dirk or dagger on his person (Pen. Code, S 12020, subd. (a)(4)), and the jury found true the allegation that he had personally used a deadly or dangerous weapon in the commission of the robbery (Pen. Code, S 12022, subd. (b)(1)). The court found true allegations that defendant had suffered four prior serious felony convictions (Pen. Code, SS 667, subds. (a), (b) (i), 1170.12) and five times served prison terms for felony convictions (Pen. Code, S 667.5, subd. (b)). Defendant was committed to state prison to serve an indeterminate term of 25 years to life consecutive to a determinate term of 11 years. On appeal, defendant claims that the trial court erred in giving a prejudicially erroneous instruction on the "concealed" element of the carrying a concealed dirk or dagger count. He also contends that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to strike the prior conviction findings. Finally, defendant maintains that his sentence is unconstitutionally cruel and/or unusual punishment. Court reject his contentions and affirm the judgment.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale