P. v. Foster
Filed 6/22/06 P. v. Foster CA1/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TRENT ALBERT FOSTER, Defendant and Appellant. | A110584 (Mendocino County Super. Ct. No. SCUK-CRCR-04-61427-02) |
Following denial of his motion to suppress evidence, defendant entered a plea of nolo contendere to possession of heroin for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351) and possession of methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378). On appeal, he renews his objections to a pat search and a search of his vehicle that resulted in the discovery of controlled substances. We find that the searches were lawful, and affirm the judgment.
STATEMENT OF FACTS[1]
About 2:45 a.m. on January 5, 2004, Deputy Crabb of the Mendocino County Sheriff's Department was assigned to beat patrol in the downtown area of Mendocino, which has â€
