legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Fournier

P. v. Fournier
03:31:2006

P. v. Fournier




Filed 3/29/06 P. v. Fournier CA6




NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS




California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA






SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT












THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


MAY ELIZABETH FOURNIER,


Defendant and Appellant.



H028462


(Santa Cruz County


Super. Ct. Nos. F03505, F04945 &


F07755)



Defendant, May Elizabeth Fournier appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court revoked her probation and sentenced her to state prison. In 2001 and 2002, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful use of personal identifying information (Pen. Code, § 530.5, subd. (a)), eight counts of felony burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) and one count of possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377). She was placed on probation. In 2003, defendant pleaded guilty to another count of possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377). Her probation was revoked and then reinstated pursuant to Proposition 36. After defendant committed new offenses in 2004, her probation was again terminated, but this time the trial court sentenced her to state prison for a total of six years. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal. She did not seek a certificate of probable cause. We appointed counsel to represent defendant in this court.


Appointed counsel filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts but raises no specific issues. We notified defendant of her right to submit written argument in her own behalf within 30 days. That period has elapsed and we have received no written argument from defendant.


Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal.


Disposition


The judgment is affirmed.


_____________________________________


rushing, P.J.


WE CONCUR:


_________________________________


PREMO, J.


_________________________________


ELIA, J.


Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.


Analysis and review provided by Poway Apartment Manager Attorneys.





Description A decision regarding unlawful use of personal identifying information and felony burglary.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale