Fear Not Law Articles: P. v. Garcia

P. v. Garcia

Filed 2/13/07 P. v. Garcia CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

RAYMOND GARCIA,

Defendant and Appellant.

B187589

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. KA070018)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Michael A. Latin, Judge. Affirmed.

Meredith Fahn, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Lawrence M. Daniels, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Viet H. Nguyen, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to dismiss his prior â€

Description	Defendant asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to dismiss his prior "strike" conviction under People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 (Romero). Court conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion. Court therefore affirm.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.