P. v. George
Filed 4/5/07 P. v. George CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KEITH THADDEUS GEORGE, Defendant and Appellant. | E040916 (Super.Ct.No. INF51714) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Richard A. Erwood, Judge. Affirmed.
Leslie A. Rose, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
On April 26, 2006, in case No. INF51714, the District Attorney of Riverside County filed a first amended information which charged defendant with three counts of violating Penal Code[1]sections 288.5 (count one) and 288, subdivision (a) (counts two and three). Special allegations were also filed pursuant to sections 1203.066, subdivision (a)(8), section 667, subdivisions (c) & (e)(1), and section 1170.12, subdivision (c)(1).
Thereafter, pursuant to section 1192.7, defendant, represented by counsel, pled guilty as charged and was committed to state prison for 40 years and awarded the appropriate custody credits.
Defendant appealed, and upon his request this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493] setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.
We offered the defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done.
We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
RAMIREZ
P.J.
We concur:
HOLLENHORST
J.
RICHLI
J.
Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Property line Lawyers.
[1] All further statutory references are to the Penal Code, unless otherwise indicated.
