P. v. Glass
Filed 4/25/06 P. v. Glass CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
----
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. VONZELL RUDOLPH GLASS, Defendant and Appellant. | C049128
(Super. Ct. No. 04F08633)
|
A jury found defendant Vonzell Rudolph Glass guilty of assault with a firearm, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, carrying a concealed weapon, and negligent discharge of a firearm. In a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court found true the allegations that defendant had three prior convictions and sentenced him to a total of 17 years in state prison.
Defendant raises three errors on appeal. First, he contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because he was subject to a prolonged detention and unconstitutional search. Second, defendant argues the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing argument. Third, he asserts there was insufficient evidence for the trial court to find that he had a prior felony conviction. Because we find no merit in any of these arguments, we will affirm.
FACTS
On September 30, 2004, Tracy Washington, a dispatcher for the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, received a call from a person identifying herself as Niko. Niko told Washington she had seen â€
