legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Gonzales CA2/6

mk's Membership Status

Registration Date: May 18, 2017
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 05:23:2018 - 13:04:09

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
P. v. Mendieta CA4/1
Asselin-Normand v. America Best Value Inn CA3
In re C.B. CA3
P. v. Bamford CA3
P. v. Jones CA3

Find all listings submitted by mk
P. v. Gonzales CA2/6
By
05:27:2017

Filed 4/6/17 P. v. Gonzales CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX


THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CAMILLO GONZALES,

Defendant and Appellant.
2d Crim. No. B277522
(Super. Ct. No. PA083698-01)
(Los Angeles County)

Camillo Gonzales appeals a judgment following his guilty plea to arson (Pen. Code, § 451, subd. (d)) and his subsequent admission that he violated his probation conditions.
We appointed counsel to represent Gonzales on this appeal. After examination of the record, his counsel filed an opening brief requesting the court to make an independent review under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.
On March 2, 2017, we sent Gonzales a letter advising him of his right to file a supplemental brief. That letter was returned in the mail with the notation “unable to forward.” Counsel has filed a declaration and states that he informed Gonzales of his right to file a supplemental brief. As of this date, Gonzales has not filed a supplemental brief.
After examination of the record, we are satisfied that Gonzales’s attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at pp. 441, 443.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.




GILBERT, P. J.

We concur:



YEGAN, J.



PERREN, J.


Cynthia L. Ulfig, Judge

Superior Court County of Los Angeles

______________________________


David Blake Chatfield, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.




Description Camillo Gonzales appeals a judgment following his guilty plea to arson (Pen. Code, § 451, subd. (d)) and his subsequent admission that he violated his probation conditions.
We appointed counsel to represent Gonzales on this appeal. After examination of the record, his counsel filed an opening brief requesting the court to make an independent review under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 10 views. Averaging 10 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale