P. v. Gonzalez
Filed 5/30/06 P. v. Gonzalez CA2/8
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PATRICIO GONZALEZ, Defendant and Appellant. | B176484 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA 255461) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. George G. Lomeli, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded.
Stephen Temko, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Deborah J. Chuang and Lauren E. Dana, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
* * * * * *
Shortly after 11:00 a.m. on a Tuesday morning, appellant Patricio Gonzalez committed multiple sex crimes upon Boo H., while they were alone in Boo's beauty salon. Boo had notified her clients that the shop was closed that day for her birthday, and planned to leave with family members when they arrived at noon. Although the shop had an appointments-only policy, and appellant did not have an appointment, Boo had invited him into the salon and agreed to give him a haircut, before her family members were due to arrive.
Appellant was convicted of forcible rape, burglary, and three counts of forcible oral copulation. As to the rape and oral copulation charges, the jury found true that the acts took place â€
