P. v. Goodrich
Filed 7/2/07 P. v. Goodrich CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID GOODRICH, Defendant and Appellant. | E042059 (Super.Ct.No. FVI025067) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. John M. Tomberlin, Judge. Affirmed.
Richard L. Schwartzberg, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
On December 4, 2006, in case No. FVI025067, pursuant to Penal Code section 859a, defendant, represented by counsel, pled nolo contendere to a violation of Vehicle Code section 23152(a), driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Defendant also admitted the special allegation of a prior conviction charged pursuant to that Vehicle Code provision. Thereafter, defendant was committed to state prison for 16 months less custody credits and in accordance with the negotiated disposition, defendants sentence in case No. FVI-020425 was ordered to run concurrent to the underlying offense.
Defendant appealed, and upon his request this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493] setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.
We offered the defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done.
We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
disposition
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
RAMIREZ
P.J.
We concur:
McKINSTER
J.
MILLER
J.
Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Santee Property line attorney.
