P. v. Grant
Filed 6/26/06 P. v. Grant CA1/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL CAMERON GRANT, Defendant and Appellant. | A112645 (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. SC058372) |
Counsel for Michael Cameron Grant has filed an opening brief in which he raises no issues and asks this court for an independent review of the record as required by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. We have conducted that review, and finding no arguable issues, affirm the judgment.
Background
Defendant was charged by amended information with receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a)[1]), possessing forged or counterfeit state identification (§ 472), possessing false checks with the intent to utter the checks (§ 475) and with the misdemeanor of falsely identifying himself to a police officer (§ 148.9, subd. (a).) It further was alleged that defendant had suffered a number of prior convictions rendering him ineligible for probation (§ 1203, subd. (e)(4)), and had suffered prior strike convictions (§ 1170.12.) It also was alleged that defendant had served a separate prison term in connection with a 1999 conviction for operating a motor vehicle without the owner's consent (Veh. Code, § 10851).
Defendant entered a â€