P. v. Heltsley
Filed 3/1/06 P. v. Heltsley CA1/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EARL LESLIE HELTSLEY, Defendant and Appellant. | A110244 (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. 032436-8) |
Counsel appointed for defendant Earl Leslie Heltsley has asked this court to examine the record in accordance with People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. That examination reveals the following:
At the preliminary examination, Richmond Police Officer Harris testified that he was approached by a man named Rogers, Rogers's girlfriend, and her daughter. Harris has known Rogers for about a dozen years. Rogers and the daughter advised Harris that defendant (who was Rogers's half-brother) was at a donut shop (where the daughter worked and where defendant lived) â€
