P. v. Herrera
Filed 8/2/06 P. v. Herrera CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARIO ALBERT HERRERA, Defendant and Appellant. | 2d Crim. No. B188377 (Super. Ct. No. 2004048588) (Super. Ct. No. 2005019469) (Ventura County)
|
Mario Albert Herrera appeals from the judgment entered after he pled guilty in case number 2004048588 to inflicting corporal injury on a cohabitant (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a))[1] and admitted a prior prison term enhancement (§ 667.5, subd. (b)).
Appellant also appeals from the judgment entered in case number 20050194969 after he pled guilty to false personation of another (§ 529(3)).[2]
The trial court denied probation and sentenced appellant in case number 2004048588 to two years state prison on the corporal injury offense plus one year on the prison term enhancement. In case number 2005019469, appellant was sentenced to eight months state prison for false personation, to be served consecutive to the sentence in case number 2004048588. Appellant's total sentence was three years eight months. The trial court ordered appellant to pay a $200 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)), a $200 parole revocation fine (§ 1202.45), and victim restitution (§ 1202.4, subd. (f)) in each case.
We appointed counsel to represent appellant in both appeals. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.
On June 13, 2006, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We have not received a response.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgments are affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
YEGAN, J.
We concur:
GILBERT, P.J.
PERREN, J.
Ken R. Riley, Judge
Superior Court County of Ventura
______________________________
California Appellate Project, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Richard L. Lennon, Staff Attorney, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Respondent.
Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.
Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Real Estate Attorney.
[1] All statutory references are to the Penal Code.
[2] Appellant's appeal (2d Crim. No. B188378) from the judgment in case number 2005019469 was consolidated with the appeal (2d Crim. No. B188377) from the judgment in case number 2004048588.
