legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hunsucker

P. v. Hunsucker
02:17:2007

P


P. v. Hunsucker


Filed 2/14/07  P. v. Hunsucker CA1/4


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION FOUR







THE PEOPLE,


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


BRUCE JASON HUNSUCKER,


            Defendant and Appellant.


      A114346


      (Humboldt County


      Super. Ct. Nos. CR056079,


      CR061550, CR061196)



            Pursuant to a negotiated disposition in three cases, appellant Bruce Jason Hunsucker pled guilty to vehicle theft (Veh. Code, §  10851) with a prior vehicle theft conviction (Pen. Code, §  666.5) and admitted a state prison prior (Pen. Code, §  667.5, subd. (b)).  (Case No. CR061196.)  He also pled guilty to carrying a loaded firearm (Pen. Code, §  12031) and receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, §  496).  (Case No. CR061550.)  Finally, he pled guilty to evading a police officer.  (Veh. Code, §  2800.2.)  (Case No. CR056079.)  The agreed-upon sentence was six years.  Other counts were dismissed and appellant received the agreed-upon sentence of six years.[1]


            Counsel for appellant has filed an opening brief raising no issues and asking this court to conduct an independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.  We have conducted the requested review and conclude that there are no arguable issues.


            Appellant was represented throughout the proceedings by counsel.  Appellant's plea and admissions were validly entered.  He received the agreed-upon sentence.  There was no sentencing error.


            Judgment affirmed.


                                                                                    _________________________


                                                                                    Reardon, J.


We concur:


_________________________


Ruvolo, P.J.


_________________________


Rivera, J.


Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.


Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Property line attorney.






            [1] The midterm of three years for the vehicle theft with a prior theft, three eight-month consecutive terms (one-third the midterm) for the remaining counts, plus one year for the state prison prior.






Description Pursuant to a negotiated disposition in three cases, appellant pled guilty to vehicle theft (Veh. Code, S 10851) with a prior vehicle theft conviction (Pen. Code, S 666.5) and admitted a state prison prior (Pen. Code, S 667.5, subd. (b)). (Case No. CR061196.) He also pled guilty to carrying a loaded firearm (Pen. Code, S 12031) and receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, S 496). (Case No. CR061550.) Finally, he pled guilty to evading a police officer. (Veh. Code, S 2800.2.) (Case No. CR056079.) The agreed-upon sentence was six years. Other counts were dismissed and appellant received the agreed-upon sentence of six years.
Court to conduct an independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Judgment affirmed.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale