P. v. Johnson
Filed 10/2/06 P. v. Johnson CA2/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. VINCENT JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant. | B188302 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA064263) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,
Mark Kim, Judge. Affirmed.
John Doyle, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_________________________
Vincent Johnson appeals the judgment (order revoking probation) entered following his plea of guilty to sale of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a)) and admission of a prior narcotics related conviction within the meaning of Health and Safety Code section 11370.2, subdivision (a). Upon finding Johnson in violation of probation, the trial court imposed a previously suspended term of seven years in state prison.
We appointed counsel to represent Johnson on this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel sought and obtained correction of Johnson’s presentence custody credit in the trial court, then filed an opening brief which raised no issues and requested this court to conduct an independent review of the record. By notice filed August 21, 2006, the clerk of this court advised Johnson to submit any contention, ground of appeal or argument he wished this court to consider within 30 days. No response has been received to date.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied Johnson’s counsel has complied fully with counsel’s responsibilities. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 278-284 [145 L.Ed.2d 756]; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443
DISPOSITION
The judgment (order revoking probation) is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
KLEIN, P. J.
We concur:
KITCHING, J. ALDRICH, J.
Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.
Analysis and review provided by El Cajon Property line Lawyers.
