P. v. King
Filed 10/18/06 P. v. King CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LAWRENCE KING, Defendant and Appellant. | E040558 (Super.Ct.No. FSB051092) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. J. Michael Welch, Judge. Affirmed.
Jamie L. Popper, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
On September 23, 2005, the defendant, represented by counsel, pled guilty to a violation of Health and Safety code section 11352, subdivision (a), and admitted the special allegations filed pursuant to Health and Safety code section 667.5, subdivision (b).
Thereafter, and in accordance with the negotiated disposition, the defendant was committed to state prison for six (6) years less custody credits and the remaining special allegations were stricken on motion of the District Attorney and in the interests of justice pursuant to Penal Code section 1385.
Defendant appealed, and upon his request this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493] setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.
We offered the defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, and he has done so. Defendant has filed a three-page supplemental brief which was read and considered by the court.
We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
RAMIREZ
P.J.
We concur:
RICHLI
J.
MILLER
J.
Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Poway Property line Lawyers.
