legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Laczko

P. v. Laczko
09:30:2007

P. v. Laczko







Filed 9/14/06 P. v. Laczko CA3







NOT TO BE PUBLISHED



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT


(Butte)


----








THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


LARRY ROBERT LACZKO,


Defendant and Appellant.






C049973



(Super. Ct. No. CM021860)





Defendant Larry Robert Laczko pled no contest to embezzlement of over $400 by a public officer. (Pen. Code, §§ 487, subd. (a), 504.)[1] He admitted an allegation that the embezzlement was of public funds and property of the Butte County Clerk/Recorder. (§ 514.) Following a restitution hearing, imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was placed on probation for five years on the condition, among others, that he serve 90 days of incarceration. Defendant was ordered to pay victim restitution to Butte County in the amount of $29,344.17, consisting of $26,439.17 â€





Description A decision regarding embezzlement by a public officer. On appeal, defendant contends the award of restitution for the costs of finding the embezzled funds is neither authorized by statute or decisional authority nor supported by substantial evidence. Court affirm the judgment.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale