P. v. Lopez
Filed 5/25/10 P. v. Lopez CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Yuba)
----
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. VINCENTE LOPEZ, Defendant and Appellant. | C063011 (Super. Ct. No. CRF07781) |
Following a contested hearing on a petition to revoke probation, the trial court found defendant Vincente Lopez to be in violation of probation a second time for failure to successfully complete a court-ordered drug treatment program. The court denied probation and sentenced defendant to the upper term of five years in state prison, minus presentence custody credits. The court also imposed specified fees and fines. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant.
Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error in favor of defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
RAYE , J.
We concur:
BLEASE , Acting P. J.
HULL, J.
Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Property line Lawyers.
