P. v. Luangnikone
Filed 6/20/06 P. v. Luangnikone CA2/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PASANEMITH LUANGNIKONE, Defendant and Appellant. | B186744 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MA031762) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Brian C. Yep, Judge. Affirmed.
Michele A. Douglass, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_________________________________
A jury convicted Pasanemith Luangnikone of unlawfully driving or taking a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)), following which he admitted a prior conviction for the same offense (Pen. Code, § 666.5). The trial court sentenced Luangnikone to state prison for a term of two years for the current offense plus one year for the prior, a total term of three years.
Luangnikone filed a notice of appeal and we appointed appellate counsel. On April 28, 2006, Luangnikone's lawyer filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. On May 1, we notified Luangnikone that he had 30 days within which to submit any grounds of appeal or arguments he wanted us to consider. Luangnikone has not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and are satisfied that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
VOGEL, J.
We concur:
MALLANO, Acting P.J. ROTHSCHILD, J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney referral.
Analysis and review provided by Vista Apartment Manager Lawyers.