P. v. Mayo
Filed 11/16/06 P. v. Mayo CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(San Joaquin)
----
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LEON MAYO, Defendant and Appellant. | C052277
(Super. Ct. No. SF095416B)
|
Defendant Leon Mayo pled guilty to four counts of second degree robbery and admitted a firearm use enhancement in exchange for a stipulated sentence of 16 years in state prison and the dismissal of the remaining counts and enhancements charged in the information.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
ROBIE , J.
We concur:
SIMS , Acting P.J.
HULL , J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.
Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Property line attorney.
