P. v. Mayo
Filed 9/27/06 P. v. Mayo CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT MAXWELL MAYO, Defendant and Appellant. |
F049977
(Super. Ct. No. F0590233-0)
O P I N I O N |
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. David Gottlieb, Judge.
Gregory L. Cannon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. French, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
Appellant, Robert Maxwell Mayo, pled no contest to corporal injury on a cohabitant (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)) and admitted a great bodily injury enhancement (Pen. Code, § 12022.7, subd. (e)). On January 9, 2006, the court sentenced Mayo to an aggregate term of eight years, the middle term of four years on the substantive offense and the middle term of four years on the enhancement.
Mayo’s appellate counsel has filed a brief which summarizes the facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Mayo has not responded to this court’s invitation to submit additional briefing.
Following independent review of the record we find that no reasonably arguable factual or legal issues exist.
The judgment is affirmed.
Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.
Analysis and review provided by El Cajon Property line attorney.
* Before Vartabedian, Acting P.J., Harris, J., and Cornell, J.
